首页> 外文OA文献 >Carpe the academy:Dismantling higher education and prefiguring critical utopias through action research
【2h】

Carpe the academy:Dismantling higher education and prefiguring critical utopias through action research

机译:掌管学院:通过行动研究取消高等教育并预判关键的乌托邦

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper engages with the challenge of re-imagining higher education. We start from the position that the ascent of the increasingly corporatized university is deeply problematic precisely because of the neoliberal realist position on ‘the future’ that it assumes and perpetuates: the view that there is no alternative to neoliberal capitalist market principles, that present and future realities can diverge only to the extent permitted by existing market forces and rationales (Amsler, 2011). In this context, ‘education’ takes the form of preparing and socializing the next generation of workers: a future focus severely limited in the possibilities it considers. Thus we are faced with a mutually-constitutive relationship where constrained visions of future needs and demands serve to constrain present educational offerings; a dynamic which becomes self-reinforcing and which admits little disruption. In this paper, we draw on the concrete body of practice known as action research to consider how we might prize open spaces for thinking much more expansively about what ‘the future’ might entail, and what forms of education are necessary in the present to keep open, rather than shut down, diverse possibilities and democratic debate around this. We focus on Critical Utopian Action Research (and to a lesser extent Systemic Action Research) as illustrative of key qualities of prefigurative and critical utopian engagement with educational presents and futures. We conclude that the capture of the university by neoliberal logics can be resisted and challenged through radical methodologies, like action research, which explicitly set out to be ongoingly anti-hegemonic, necessarily critical, self-reflexive, pluralistic, and non-recuperative (Firth, 2013; Garforth, 2009).
机译:本文面临着重新构想高等教育的挑战。我们从这样一个立场开始,即日益社团化的大学的崛起深深地存在问题,这恰恰是因为新自由主义对“未来”的假定和延续存在着新自由主义的现实立场:关于新自由主义资本主义市场原则的存在和存在,没有其他选择。未来的现实只会在现有市场力量和理论基础允许的范围内发生分歧(Amsler,2011年)。在这种情况下,“教育”采取了为下一代工人做准备并使他们社会化的形式:未来的重点严重地限制了它所考虑的可能性。因此,我们面临着一种相互构成的关系,在这种关系中,对未来需求和需求的制约视野会制约着目前的教育事业。动态性变得自我增强,几乎没有破坏。在本文中,我们借鉴了称为行动研究的具体实践,来考虑我们如何奖励开放空间,以更广泛地思考“未来”可能需要什么,以及当前需要什么样的教育形式来保持公开而不是关闭各种可能性,并围绕此展开民主辩论。我们专注于批判性的乌托邦行动研究(在较小程度上是系统性行动研究),以说明预言性和批判性的乌托邦与教育礼物和未来交往的关键品质。我们得出的结论是,新自由主义逻辑对大学的占领可以通过激进的方法论来抵制和挑战,例如行动研究。行动研究明确地指出,这种研究正在不断地反霸权,必然地批判性,自我反省,多元性和非积蓄性(Firth (2013年;加福斯,2009年)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号